Chris,
It's there -- really really:
http://www.millennics.com/olympus/tope/gallery.html
Click "Bokeh" etc. etc.
Joel W.
>===== Original Message From Chris Barker <imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> =====
>Hmm Joel, I looked eagerly for your name under "Bokeh", but to no
>avail. Your "Portrait" entry, sweet though it is, does not really
>have bokeh given the plain background. So... where is your 90/2 shot?
>
>Chris
>
>At 07:31 -0600 10/02/03, Joel Wilcox wrote:
>>
>>The 90/2 goes to 1:2, so it is a fairly conservative macro lens. I
>>have a Vivitar 100/2.8 that goes 1:1. It is possibly more versatile
>>as a macro, but it is softer wide open and very long and unwieldy
>>when fully extended. Which is fine for macro, but the 90/2 gets
>>used for lots of other things too, even portraiture and general
>>photography.
>>
>>It has both good sharpness and contrast, but it is neither the
>>sharpest nor contrastiest Zuiko. Some function of these two
>>qualities, combined with the focal length, makes photos with shallow
>>DOF usually look very attractive, as the sharp area sits against the
>>sometimes rather creamy blur of the background (usually the
>>background, but sometimes the foreground -- see my TOPE entry under
>>the category of "Bokeh"). This conjunction of focal length, blur,
>>and sharpness is what people refer to as the "bokeh" of the 90/2.
>>
>>Recanting my slur of the blur,
>>Joel W.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|