>From: "R. Jackson" <jackson.robert.r@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>Anyone own one of these and want to comment on it?
You must be new here? The archives are FULL of discussion about this lens.
>I'm just kind of
>curious as to what the consensus is on this lens.
There's no consensus. It seems to be split into three camps:
1) I have it, and it is one of my favorite lenses. You'll have to pry it from
my cold, dead hands.
2) I don't have it, but would kill to pry it from someone else's cold, dead
hands.
3) I'm sure it's a lovely lens, but it is just too expensive. I think my
Kubicron 92mm f2.65 takes ALMOST as good a picture, and it only cost $39.95 at
a K-Mart blue light special.
There is no "group 4" of folks who have anything significantly bad to say about
it.
--
: Jan Steinman -- nature Transography(TM): <http://www.Bytesmiths.com>
: Bytesmiths -- artists' services: <http://www.Bytesmiths.com/Services>
: Buy My Step Van! <http://www.Bytesmiths.com/van>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|