On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 08:11 AM, William Clark wrote:
This is at the high end of the 38-380 zoom (which is an incredible
zoom).
Unless you have the 350 2.8 you will get chroma. I was perfectly
willing to
take this chroma for the superb 38-380 IS lens. Chroma is easily
removed in
virtaully all image editing software now.
On my S2, my cheap Nikon 70-300 ED lens ($600 Canadian) has much better
performance (hardly any chroma). The 2100uz has low chroma at the
lower
focal lengths, which is what one would expect.
-Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: C.H.Ling [mailto:chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: February 3, 2003 11:13 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Blurry Digital images, clear OM shots
I'm a bit worry if what you said low chroma is like that:
http://www.olympus.co.jp/LineUp/Digicamera/C2100uz/c2100uzsp_03.html
C.H.Ling
That is an unfortunate example, especially on the Olympus web site.
According to DP Review it is not bad compared with other cameras of
that sort with most of the CA coming in at the long focal lengths. And
why is it that Olympus told us that they could not build a digital OM
for our lenses? Wide angle CA? Humph!
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympusc2100uz/page13.asp
For comparison look at the really bad CA look at the bottom of this
page for the C-5050.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympusc5050z/page16.asp
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California, USA
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|