Hej! Welcome to the list Mattias. Now there will be plenty of people
here who would have you believe that not only should you get the 135/2.8
but also the 90/2, 180/2 and 75-150 just to really make sure you've got
medium telephoto lengths covered. But personally I find my 135/3.5 an
extremely useful lens - nice and sharp and a great focal length. That
price looks very good and it will be excellent value for money.
As far as 28mm lenses go, I own a Tokina 28/2.8 which is my most used
lens, and was pretty cheap - certainly cheaper than the Zuiko 28/2.8.
As far as I am concerned it does the job more than adequately.
Hope that helps,
Roger
By the way, the link in your signature doesn't work for me - comes up
with a page not found error.
Mattias Tidlund wrote:
So here I am with two bodies and one Zuiko. On the top of my wish list
is a 135 and a 28. Today I found a very nice and clean 135/3.5
Silvernose. The price was 350 SEK ($40). Is this a good deal? I suppose
the 135/3.5 Silvernose aren't multi coated, or am I wrong? Maybe it is
just stupid stinginess buying a 135/3.5 instead of 135/2.8?
// Mattias
Mattias Tidlund
mtd98005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://rundfunk.ath.cx/photos/
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|