Subject: | [OM] Re: Film look vs. Digital look |
---|---|
From: | Stephen Scharf <scharfsj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:16:36 -0800 |
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:54:38 -0800 From: Jan Steinman <Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [OM] Re: Film look vs. Digital lookFrom: Stephen Scharf <scharfsj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> I need to make a calibration for the printer.....just haven't been able to pony up $100 for getting a profile made because I haven't decided on what paper I will settle on permanently, and I can't afford to have custom profiles made for every paper I've tried!Do you have a decent flatbed scanner?If so, you might consider Monoco EZColor. It uses your scanner as a photospectrometer to generate profiles. I think it costs about the same as one or two of your "custom" profiles.Works with MacOS 9 or X. Thank for the tip, Jan. I will check it out. -Stephen. -- 2001 CBR600F4i - Fantastic! < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] were you just baiting us?, Joe Gwinn |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Tripods? (now really OT), Joe Gwinn |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Film look vs. Digital look, Jan Steinman |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: First night in Leic*-land. ;-), Jan Steinman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |