I currently own the Olympus 100/2.8, but I've been looking at the Tamron
90/2.5 for standard shooting and macro work. It seems like a good way to
have two lenses in one. Does anyone on the list have actual experience with
the lens as a standard lens? I would imagine it would be quite similar to
the Olympus 100/2.8 in performance, but I have no way to measure.
I'm quite interested in acquiring one, but maybe it's redundant with a
100/2.8? (And I have the 50/3.5 Olympus Macro.)
James.
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8 is here: Try it free* for 2 months
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|