On Wednesday, January 8, 2003, at 10:38 AM, William Clark wrote:
What would you like to know?
For years I just shot with my OM1n and an old Argus. Then I got an
F80 and
loved it (so I have lenses). The S2 is an F80 re-worked. I chose the
S2
over the D100 because it has a much better interface. It also is much
better out of the box. With very young kids at home I do not have the
time
to "post-process" everything. I had the D100 for a weekend and had to
adjust all my shots. Prints are superb from the S2 and I can use all
my
lenses. Raw shooting is ok (I use Bibble).
This is not to say I am not interested in Oly, but an interchangeable
Olympus system is silly for me (I will then have to get another set of
lenses). Now, if an E30 with a fixed 28-200 2.8 lens comes then, well
maybe
;0).
I had wanted a superb upgrade from my 2100UZ, which I still have.
IMHO no
consumer digital camera can though the 2100UZ (still!!!). Did you
want any
specific info on the S2?
-Bill
I was mostly interested in your subjective impression, both on image
quality and ease of use. The CCD design is certainly interesting and
does very well in comparison testing.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|