The order in which I put them was not accidental.
Moose
Mickey Trageser wrote:
Good points, Moose.
I think I'm most inclined to believe #1 and least inclined to believe #3. If
physics demand the barrel length in order to achieve the macro focus, then
itcannot be ignored, but Oly seemed intent on breaking the monolithic molds
of Nikkor design. I prefer to believe that the obstacle couldn't be
overcome.... #2 would just be a natural result of #1.
:-)
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|