Yes, Vuescan is much slower than the original software, the post
processing time after scanning is long, it depends on CPU speed, even
a 2.4GHz P4 looks slow. If you have a machine slower than 1GHz, don't
try to scan a 60MB file, it takes a year to complete.
C.H.Ling
Walt Wayman wrote:
>
> I have an HP S20. A month or so ago I coughed up the $40 for
> Vuescan. After trying it for a half dozen or so scans, I was not
> particularly impressed. For one thing, it seemed a lot slower
> than the HP software, so I gave up on it. Since some of you keep
> singing its praises, it looks like maybe I need to go back and try
> it again. Maybe I didn't have both feet on the floor.
>
> As for the S20, it ain't the greatest, but I've got no real
> complaints. I've had mine over three years now and have had zero
> problems -- except for the time Max (one of our cats) whizzed on
> it, and then it only needed cleaning. Most of my scans are from
> trannies, Provia 100 and 400 or Kodachrome 64, but I've gotten
> pretty good results from Fuji NPS and NPC too.
>
> Walt
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|