Walt,
If your wife is like mine, you don't handle the checkbook because there are
still Zuikos to be had.... ;-)
-Mickey
----- Original Message -----
From: "Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Re: Dipping our Toe Into Digital (LONG)
> That's what happens when the simple-minded, especially those who
> suffer from inumeracy, try to do math in their heads after
> midnight. It may also help to explain why my wife won't let me
> carry the checkbook. :-)
>
>
> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> From: "Mickey Trageser" <vze3m2s8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 09:55:32 -0500
>
> >But it's worse, Walt. The magnification for 8x10 from 35mm is
> >nearly 8.5x....
> >-Mickey
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxxxx>
> >To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 12:32 AM
> >Subject: Re: [OM] Re: Dipping our Toe Into Digital (LONG)
> >
> >
> >>I'm on your side, Mark. I shoot big stuff too. I actually
> >>thought some of the numbers were quite impressive, especially
> >>considering that an 8x10 print from a 4x5 negative is only a 2X
> >>enlargement, not 6X like 35mm. That means a 35mm lens would have
> >>to resolve 200 lpm to equal a large format lens at 50 lpm. I
> >>haven't seen any of those.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|