>From: Albert <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>with the introduction of the Kodak 14Mpx SLR, it would seem like you
>can get what you never thought possible before, Medium format quality in
>a 35mm SLR.
That depends on whose numbers you believe. My research indicates that an
optimal 35mm frame may contain as much as 18Mpx. Medium format may contain
40Mpx.
In 1997, I predicted that price/performance parity between digital and 35mm was
8 years off. I stand by that: it's now 3 years off.
(That doesn't mean there won't be earlier performance-parity cameras, just that
they won't be affordable. The Kodak is what, a $3,000 body?)
I think price/performance parity with medium format is still 5 years out, with
4x5, 8 years, and with 8x10, 11 years. Then kiss film goodbye in ~2013.
According to a recent survey, film sales have already peaked; film is now on
the downslope of Geoffrey Moore's technology adoption lifecycle, characterized
by what Moore calls "technology laggards." (in "Chrossing the Chasm")
This is not mere crystal-ball gazing; it's simple back-of-envelope math based
on Moore's Law. (different Moore :-)
(Of course, there will always be a niche market for fine art photochemistry,
just as some brush-media artists still mix their own egg temupra.)
So you "fence sitters" still have about 3 years to grouse and whine, or you can
start getting some actual experience on a state-of-the-art-minus-one camera
TODAY, then step up to the plate in 3 years.
--
: Jan Steinman -- nature Transography(TM): <http://www.Bytesmiths.com>
: Bytesmiths -- artists' services: <http://www.Bytesmiths.com/Services>
: Buy My Step Van! <http://www.Bytesmiths.com/van>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|