| Subject: | Re: [OM] Film vs. Digital in terms of $$$ (long) |
|---|---|
| From: | Jim Brokaw <jbrokaw@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 19 Dec 2002 21:50:18 -0800 |
on 12/19/02 7:13 AM, AG Schnozz at agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Iowa ain't that cheap. We spend similar amounts on housing and > cars. It's just that both are a whole lot bigger. > > AG I thought that was Texas... or is it -everything's- bigger in TEXAS...? -- Jim Brokaw OM-1's, -2's, -4's, (no -3's yet) and no OM-oney... < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] VIRUS ALERT, Bryan Pilati |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Film vs. Digital in terms of $$$ (long), siddiq |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] Film vs. Digital in terms of $$$ (long), AG Schnozz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Film vs. Digital in terms of $$$ (long), siddiq |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |