Subject: | Re: [OM] Less than wonderful Zuiko? |
---|---|
From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:29:33 -0800 |
But it took great pictures, every bit the equal of the 35-80 in the sharpness and snap categories. I didn't test the distortion, but not many fast zooms do well there. The Zuiko is no exception, exhibiting distortion at both ends.I loved the extra range on the zoom.But I've gotten by just fine with my 35-80. When shooting with it, I typically carry a 2nd body with a 21 or 24 and either a 135/2.8 or the ..gulp.. 80-200/2.8 Tamron monster as it's companion. I didn't investigate the bokeh, but it can be an issue with some lenses. It's not imaginary, by any measure. And it is elusive to describe and confirm. Don't underestimate the bokeh quality to make or break the same shot taken with different lenses. Skip But does it have that elusive, legendary Zuiko glow? :-) -- Winsor Crosby Long Beach, California < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Olympus OM Lens to Canon EOS Body Adapter, Mike Veglia |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Re: Digital True Lies, Mike Veglia |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Less than wonderful Zuiko?, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Less than wonderful Zuiko?, Roger D. Key |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |