> Stephen Scharf <scharfsj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:15:07 +0800
> >From: Albert <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: [OM] Digital vs. Film, grain
> >
> >One thing that digital will never do that film will do, is grain.
> Some
> >grain looks great. Digital however has "pixelation" which is
> horrible.
> Albert,
> That's simply not true....what digital photos have you been looking
> at?
> If anything, the "noise" than constitutes "grain" in digital cameras
> is often less
> disturbing to my eye than film grain. The one thing that I am struck
> about most
> digital photographs is their complete LACK of grain.
>
> Take a look at these and see if you see ugly pixelation...
>
> http://www.jsfotografie.de/zepeople/index.htm
> http://www.jsfotografie.de/portzeland/index.htm
>
Don't know about ugly pixelation, but definitely some ugly artifacts from what
looks like sharpening. Have a look at the hair across the girl's face.
Wayne Harridge
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~w_harridge
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|