No, I can't explain this either, but my E-10 images continue to amaze
me, even compared with those from medium format (Bronica ETRS).
I also scan my medium format negs with an Epson 2450 scanner. They
amaze me too, although many have pointed out elsewhere that the 2450
is no more than just adequate for the job.
Is it simply subjective, or is there a real measurable reason for
this?
John Gruffydd (Mold, Wales, UK)
I suspect what you are comparing is a good, though resolution
challenged digital camera, and output from an unsuitable scanner. You
might, as an experiment, have images from each printed professionally
by a good processor. Or just have an image from the Bronica scanned at
4000dpi and look at the result on your scanner compared to the best
that the E-10 can do.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|