Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Fw: [OM] OM vs. Leica

Subject: Re: Fw: [OM] OM vs. Leica
From: "John A. Lind" <jlind@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 22:37:48 -0500

At 15:37 12/9/02, John Hudson wrote:
 > miliciano
>
> = member of a militia

 There is respectable commentary on the web suggesting that Capa's famous
photo, like that of the US Marines' flag raising on Iwo Jima, is posed and
stage managed, shot during a lull in the fighting on the Republican front.
The soldier in Capa's photo was a member of the Republican army that
ultimately lost to Franco's Nationists.

 jh

Still looking for the specific camera make/model used to make the photo that launched Capa into fame. I do know numerous photographs of Capa with a camera taken during WWII unquestionably show a Zeiss Ikon Contax II.

As to both the Iwo Jima and Capa's photograph, neither were staged or otherwise faked.

The True Iwo Jima Story:
The U.S. Marine Corps has the orignal B&W negative of the Iwo Jima photograph, along with other stills made at the time from different angles, and a reel of color motion picture film, all of the same flag raising. It was, however, the SECOND flag raising on the summit. There are also still photographs of the first flag raising. When the admiral in command of the landing saw the small battle flag, he ordered it replaced with a larger one so it could be seen better. The famous photograph is of the second one. The motion picture film and other stills show clearly that it was not staged or faked. The photographer's positioning and timing were impeccable. The Navy released the now famous photograph after reviewing the stills done of both flag raisings. One look through the Navy's archive leaves little doubt as to why this particular photograph was chosen for release. It stands out among all of them. All the others look bland by comparison. BTW, the photographer of the second raising ended up working for the photographer of the first flag raising after the war.

Capa's Spanish Republican Photograph:
This was not staged or faked either. Some number of years later, the soldier was identified, his marked grave located and relatives of him confirmed he did indeed die on that day and in that battle.

There are other controversies also, such as the Life Magazine cover photograph showing the sailor kissing the nurse on VE day. That was not staged either. Indeed, a Navy photographer also caught the same thing from a slightly different angle as the Life photographer and he worked their way down the street. Both had the presence of mind to go out hunting for photo op's when word of the street celebration reached them. Have photojournalists staged, faked or otherwise performed undue darkroom manipulation? Certainly. However, these are definitely *not* among the hoaxes.

-- John


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz