May be it is hard to accept for 50/1.2 owner, sorry about that. You
can insist the problem only due to digitize but it actually shown on
4x6 print with optical lab. This bokeh can only be found on my only
non Zuiko 28-70 3.5-4.5 Tokina SD lens. The mild unsharp mark actually
make it look more like the print (poorer look), as you all know all
scans will look a little burr on monitor if no unsharp mask is used.
C.H.Ling
Bill Pearce wrote:
>
> I have the 1.2, but not the Noctilux, as I would have to sell my house. I
> would guess that the bokeh on the Noctilux is noticeably better, as it is,
> 1. about the cost of the Zuiko and the camera it came on and the car you
> drive, and, b. that is, after all, what Leica is all about. I don't find the
> bokeh on mine disgusting, but it isn't by any means perfect.
>
> Where I do have a problem is making these judgements on the basis of a photo
> on the web. Any time something is scanned and unsharp masked, it will become
> more harsh, the degree depending on the amount of USM. Also, it can't be in
> any lens' favor viewing a 72 dpi scan.
>
> Bill Pearce
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|