CH,
What's up with the bokeh in that picture?! It looks horrible. Look at the
OOF highlights to the left/down of the girl. Why would the OOF spot have a
hotspot _inside_ the blurred circle? ALso, the large OOF spots left/above
are pretty harsh.
Could you take another picture with OOF stuff all around the subject?
Thanks,
Skip
Original Message:
-----------------
From: C.H.Ling chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 20:46:41 +0800
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] shooting at f1.2 or f1.0
This one is taken with 50/1.2 wide open, PS unsharp mask 100,0.3,0.
http://www.accura.com.hk/50-12-01.jpg
Standard lens is design at infinity, the performance for distance objects is
usually better than this portrait shot.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Hudson" <13874@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Are there any opinions as to whether the Zuiko 50mm / f1.2 shot wide open
> would make a photo as sharp as this f1.0 photo?
>
> http://www.alaska.net/~rowlett/images/noctilux/bus1.htm
>
> jh
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
