Subject: | RE: [OM] ( OM ) standard lightweight setup |
---|---|
From: | "Timpe, Jim" <Jim.Timpe@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 3 Dec 2002 14:35:46 -0800 |
What we should all aspire to... I haven't responded to this thread yet. Of late, I've usually got my 4t with either 35-70/3.6 or 35-105 on it. Perhaps not the smallest or lightest, but it's sure versatile. -----Original Message----- From: R. Jackson Then again, I'm not really a photographer, I'm just a guy who likes to take pictures. -Rob < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] ( OM ) standard lightweight setup, R. Jackson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Possible sacrilege and blasphemy, Mike Veglia |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] ( OM ) standard lightweight setup, bill biesele |
Next by Thread: | [OM] ( OM ) standard lightweight setup, Alan Magayne-Roshak |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |