| Subject: | [OM] 24-200? or 28-300mm? |
|---|---|
| From: | Albert <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Nov 2002 09:06:43 +0800 |
Assuming I were to get a wunderbrick with AF for traveling, what do you
think would be a more convient lens if I only want to take one lens?
The Tokina 24-200mm, or Tamron's new 28-300XR? Of course that'd be for the gf, I'd use the OM. Albert < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re: [OM] Digital Camera fraud/false advertising, Wayne Harridge |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Is 4x6 the real standard?, Dr Timothy Hughes |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] F280 and NiMh batteries,a dn T20, Richard F. Man |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 24-200? or 28-300mm?, Richard F. Man |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |