Subject: | Re: RE: [OM] Mind Bender (intermediate focal length?) |
---|---|
From: | Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:39:57 +1100 |
> AG Schnozz <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Anyway, I was cruising the books the other day and came across a > lens comparison chart which inluded angle-of-coverages. Ahar! > I knew it! > Angle of coverage, what sense does that make ? You want area of coverage, that makes the fl 141mm ! Wayne Harridge http://members.optusnet.com.au/~w_harridge < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] Digital Camera fraud/false advertising, Marc Lawrence |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Re: [OT] was: Backpack/case question, now Lat/Long ramblings..., Dan Lau |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Mind Bender (intermediate focal length?), Jim Brokaw |
Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] Mind Bender (intermediate focal length?), Joe Gwinn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |