I recently got a truly mint 135/3.5 for UKP ?31 - about USD $45
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Don
Sent: 24 November 2002 22:50
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Thanks
The seller is gigisanibel. He has already answered my email to him. He
offered to give me a full refund for the lens, or give me a refund based on
the condition of the lens. I want to see how much it will cost to repair it
before I make a final decision.
I have a Kitstar 135 mm and after looking at the Zuiko, I can see why
everyone is much in love with the zuikos! I think that I am going to have
it repaired and use it for a long time.
The other thing that I do not understand about the 135 mm lenses is that I
have seen 135 f3.5's go for much more then the f2.8 versions. I would think
that the faster lens would be more highly desired then the slower version of
the same lens. I saw an auction for a 135 f3.5 go for over $150 recently
while I won this one for just $78. Makes no sense to me, but I am glad to
get the faster version.
Don Gaikins
At 07:45 PM 11/23/02, you wrote:
Who's the seller?
Bryan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Don" <dong357@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 2:32 PM
Subject: [OM] Thanks
> Thanks to all who commented on my 135 mm f2.8 Zuiko with the broken
> latch. I think that the consensus is that if something is described
as
> "good" it should function properly mechanically. Secondly that the
repair
> should be a minor one (I am requesting an estimate), but should be
> performed by a competent technician.
>
> I have sent an email to the seller to see if he is willing to work
with me
> on the issue. I have not left feedback on the bay yet, and what type
of
> feedback that I leave will be determined by the sellers response to my
email.
SNIP
|