On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 12:25:56AM -0500, Jim L'Hommedieu wrote:
> Or maybe they were testing the Zuiko on a body with mirror lockup and
> aperture pre-fire and the other mounts didn't have that advange coming from
> whatever bodies they were on. Gary Reese's test notes show me over and over
> again that they're less to testing than meets the eye. And more.
The numbers were determined with MTF-meassurements and their special
rating system wich is explaned a little in the belonging posting.
I´ve scanned parts of the 9/89 test you can see the diagram of
the Zuiko 3.5/18 on my website:
http://studweb.studserv.uni-stuttgart.de/studweb/users/mas/mas12462/OM/MTF/mtf-overview.html
follow the link Zuiko 3.5/18 in the "Tests fom other magazines"-section.
Now that the University realized, that I´ve finished this year, they
will cancel my account on 20th december this year. So this site will
dissapear then. Maybe I´ll be locking fo a new home, let`s see...
Frieder Faig
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|