In message <6.14bbd33.2af37043@xxxxxxx>, NSURIT@xxxxxxx writes:
>In a message dated 10/31/2002 11:14:49 PM Central Standard Time,
>VS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
>> I've made up my mind on it. I'll put the money in the OM4-Ti fund and
>> wait for a good specimen to show up on Aussie eB?y.
>>
>>
>
>I was not trying to discourage you from getting the OM 2S, just letting you
>know what the down side is to this body.
Bill,
I know that. :-) I was leaning more towards not buying it before I
mailed the list, and you just confirmed my dark thoughts about 2S. I
might get her another representative of the OM-2 family.
> If you can buy them for $160 and I
>would suggest that number is in the range at which they are available, you
>could probably buy 4 or 5 of them for what a good 4T is going to cost.
Yeah, 4T is not really cheap, but knowing the end user of the camera,
I'll be better off paying a whole lot more for 4T and not have to worry
that it might irrepairably (well, economically speaking) break down any
time now. :-) Hmmm, coming to think of it, I just spotted an OM 4 going
for about twice the price of 2S. Hmmm. Naaaah.
> Put
>another way, I have several OM 2Ss and a couple of 4s and the 4s seldom get
>used.
I think I'll still skip this 2S. I'm affraid of buying something that my
dearly belowed couldn't use forever and a day. (A slight exaggeration
doesn't hurt.)
Cheers,
Saso
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|