Subject: | Re: [OM] Hawaii recommendations (another travel kit..) |
---|---|
From: | dreammoose <dreammoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 31 Oct 2002 19:59:51 -0800 |
Weird, I guess. I shot my roll right at 400. No grain visible to my
naked 20/10 eye on a 4x6 print. Were yours earlier versons? This was ver. 3.
Moose C.H.Ling wrote: I have tried two rolls, the grain appear in one hour lab print not scanning, it is the worse film I have ever used. I think over expose it by one or two stops may be better, but I just made it dead right.For ISO400, Kodak Supra 400 and Fuji Superia are much better.C.H.Ling dreammoose wrote:Although I have only used it once, I would certainly not call it grainy. <>...... < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Opinions wanted: OK picture?, Richard F. Man |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Sunrises Was: Hawaii recommendations (another travel kit..), Tim Chakravorty |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Hawaii recommendations (another travel kit..), C.H.Ling |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Hawaii recommendations (another travel kit..), suchismit |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |