Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Length of 135/2.8

Subject: Re: [OM] Length of 135/2.8
From: Jim Brokaw <jbrokaw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 12:13:02 -0700
on 10/13/02 9:46 AM, Julian Davies at julian_davies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Okay, now I have to know.  Which are the two exceptions, the
> two shift lenses?
> 
> Pete
> 
> No, the shifts both take standard rear caps. The exceptions are the 135 and
> 80 auto macros, which have a deep rear cap to clear elements behind the
> flange. If we were talking front caps, however, there would be the 8,16, 18
> and 24 shift with non - standard caps, plus the differences between 49,55,72
> and 100mm (never measured the thickness of these) and the >123mm covers for
> the big white things. Are these leather hoods like they say, or something
> else. I've never seen one.
> 
> Julian

I had figured it would be the macro lenses... speaking of which, my recently
acquired 80/4.0 came with a front cap but no rear cap. Are these available
anywhere? For now I've used the 65-116 autotube as a rear cap, but in the
interest of completeness I always want the correct caps.
-- 

Jim Brokaw
OM-1's, -2's, -4's, (no -3's yet) and no OM-oney... 


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz