| Subject: | Re: [OM] Was it just priced too high? |
|---|---|
| From: | Mike <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 12 Oct 2002 13:18:21 -0700 |
No, not an unfair price but that lens just isn't on my short list. Especially with a much cheaper alternative like the 180/2.8. Short list by the way includes: 24 shift, 350/2.8, 50/1.2, 90/2. Unfortunately the "short" list also includes $$$ mike -- Latitude 48° 32' North, Longitude 123° 7' West < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Drying agents for photo equipment storage containers, Julian Davies |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Army Surplus (Was Rolls Royce Griffon & Hydroplane Pics), Doggre |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Was it just priced too high?, Tom Scales |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Was it just priced too high?, Jim Brokaw |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |