I had a Soligor 135/2.8, which I got fairly cheaply. It had loads of
muck on the rear element but once I'd cleaned it up it was not an
unacceptable performer. However, it fell apart after a few months use
and the Zuiko 135/3.5 I bought to replace it is a far, far superior
lens, and much better value for money - I paid 10 pounds for the Soligor
and 40 pounds for the Zuiko.
ROger
plp@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Gary's tests don't include lots of non-Olympus telephoto
lenses (heck, he couldn't test everything). So, does a
general consensus exist on non-Olympus 135mm lenses?
What about the Sigma, Hoya, Vivitar, JC Penney, etc? Any
others worth mentioning?
Pete
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|