Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] is this a silvernose

Subject: Re: [OM] is this a silvernose
From: Pschings@xxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 09:56:30 EDT
In a message dated 10/8/2002 5:56:52 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
julian_davies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:


Most lenses were originally single coated, and it's a pretty good bet that 
any silvernose will be SC, *EXCEPT* certain lenses which were always MC. The 
F2 wide angles, 200/4 180/2.8 were all produced as silvernose with letter 
prefixes and are *ALL* MC. (did I forget any?)


Of the early lenses, I think just the F2 wides were MC. I'm pretty sure the 
first 200/4's were SC. The 180/2.8 is a later design and I doubt there were 
any silvernosed or SC versions. Other lenses that were always MC include all 
of the zooms except the 75-150/4, 28/2.8, 100/2, 50/2, 90/2, 180/2, 250/2, 
350/2.8.... I'm sure I'm missing some.

Paul Schings

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz