Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] How many megapixels? (Was Rethinking the Olydak)

Subject: Re: [OM] How many megapixels? (Was Rethinking the Olydak)
From: dreammoose <dreammoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 00:28:01 -0700
Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas wrote:

I've made really good looking 8x10 prints from cropped digital images of
around 1000x1200 dpi, or about 1.2mp. That means to me that 5mp is good
for 16x20 prints, as our E-10 and E-20 users have said.


YMMV. I like to print image files of 180 dpi (720/4) or more, but I usually
find 120 dpi (720/6) acceptable. That's 2.6 MP+ or 1.15 MP for an 8x10"
print! However, a fully-scanned, properly downsampled image of "x" MP looks
*much* better than a pic form a "x" MP digicam.

Good post, and I agree with everything except this. The difference between scanned 35mm and a good 2 mp digital, printed on my Epson 1270 as 8x10s is quite subtle. Which is better? Hard to say, but it isn't for sure the film every time. I'm not saying film isn't better in many ways, it is. But my experience is different than yours.

Moose


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz