ML Archiv: [OM] Featured article on OM

Subject:	[OM] Featured article on OM
From:	"Tim Chakravorty" <suchismit@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 7 Oct 2002 23:32:44 -0700

For those of you who haven't seen it, I thought this article on the OM system 
could be
of interest .
http://www.olympus.co.jp/en/magazine/pursuit/200208/html/f_article.html


-Tim




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Disappointment, (continued) [OM] Disappointment, Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] Disappointment, Tom Scales Re: [OM] what's good... OM Lenses, Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] what's good... OM Lenses, Andre Goforth Re: [OM] what's good... OM Lenses, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] what's good... OM Lenses, iwert Re: [OM] what's good... OM Lenses, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] what's good... OM Lenses, Bolty Re: [OM] what's good... OM Lenses, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] what's good... OM Lenses, dreammoose [OM] Featured article on OM, Tim Chakravorty <= Re: [OM] Featured article on OM, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Featured article on OM, John Robison Re: [OM] Featured article on OM, John Hermanson Re: [OM] what's good... OM Lenses, Tim Chakravorty RE: [OM] what's good..., Scott Gomez RE: [OM] what's good..., Timpe, Jim [OM] FS: OM-2s, 300/4.5, 35-70 3.5~4.5 and a 50/1.4, M. Lloyd

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Junk or treasure, dreammoose
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] 35mm film lost the battle against digital ?, Tal Lancaster
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] what's good... OM Lenses, dreammoose
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Featured article on OM, C.H.Ling
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]