> Paul Farrar <farrar@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> I've been very disappointed by the decline in image quality that
> has accompanied many journalists' switch to digital (for deadline
> reasons). For example, the WTC flag raising photo was mutilated by
> digital artifacts (probably overaggressive in camera jpeg-ing). The
> Kennerly White House transition photos in Newsweek were garbage.
>
I don't know about those shots, but I find it disturbing to actually notice
those
digital artifacts (jpeg compression, over sharpening) in the daily newspapers.
If
digital can't match analogue on newsprint it has a long way to go. Perhaps
it's
just the lack of any concept of "quality" in newspapers these days - check the
spelling and grammar too.
Wayne Harridge
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~w_harridge
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|