I just took a set of photos back to the processor because all the prints looked
badly overexposed, even though the negatives were all perfect. I have been
having more and more trouble getting competent photofinishing. I suspect that
this problem is universal, and may be contributing to the rise of digital,
despite the limitations of current consumer-level digital cameras: to the
average bear, the photos look equally good (bad, really), and people don't know
what they are missing. Perhaps the average bears are correct to go to digital.
Joe Gwinn
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|