At 08:03 8/26/02, Pete wrote:
>Oh, and is there any harm in using a circular polariser with
>my OM-2 since the Nikon (with auto-focus) requires it?
No harm, except that you will have to pay attention to the
orientation of the polarizer each time before you shoot. This
is a minor detail. By the way, the best filters are multicoated
(PMC) Heliopan.
Pete
Use it just as you would a linear. I'm puzzled by "except that you will
have to pay attention to the orientation." Using a circular is no
different from using a linear; they're both the same in that regard.
The only difference between the two is a circular has a quarter-wave plate
cemented to the back side of the linear polarizing plate. The linear in
front behaves the same in both. The quarter-wave plate circularly
polarizes the (now linear polarized) light that survives filtering from the
linear plate. To a half-silvered mirror (which is a form of linear
polarizer), circularly polarized light is effectively the same as randomly
polarized light. To a full-silvered mirror (OM-2[n]) linear, circular or
random makes no difference.
-- John
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|