>Ok, I keep hearing about how smaller apertures give greater depth of
>field and apparant sharpness to a point, and then the increase is
>nullified by a rise in diffraction.
>
>My question is this: at what point does this happen? I'm not looking for
> the mathematical equation to figure it out, I just want to know for a
>given 35mm lens of a given length, say 25, 50, 100, 200, or 300, what
>would be the best aperture for sharpness.
>
>Thanks, Steve Goss, Dallas Tx usa
The rule of thumb I've always heard was 4mm. From this point and smaller,
expect diffraction effects. Just divide the lens focal length by the f-stop
to get the aperture diameter.
Keith Quarles
kquarles@xxxxxxx
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|