On Wednesday, August 14, 2002 at 10:11, w shumaker
<olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote re "Re: [OM] 4000 dpi scanner recommnda" saying:
> I can't say I have experience with the LS-4000, but I have used the
> LS-2000 for a while. The new nikon scan software is nice in many ways,
> with a combined curve and histogram adjustment control that I like
> better than photoshop 7. I have a 1.9Ghz P4 with 1g of memory and the
> auto slide feeder on the ls2000. When batch scanning, I can't do
> anything what so ever on that machine or I risk crashing nikonscan. The
> latest version is much better than previous versions. When it works, it
> is great, but it is sensitive.
...
Which version of Windoze?
2000 & XP handle multi-processing much better than ME or 9x.
tOM--
--------- http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Olympus-Documentation
--------- http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ottawa-photo-clubs
tOM Trottier, ICQ:57647974 http://abacurial.com
758 Albert St, Ottawa ON Canada K1R 7V8
+1 613 860-6633 fax:231-6115 N45.412 W75.714
"The moment one gives close attention to anything,
even a blade of grass, it becomes a mysterious,
awesome, indescribably magnificent world in itself --
Henry Miller, 1891-1980
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|