Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Rambling: OM 4/T vs. C3000

Subject: Re: [OM] Rambling: OM 4/T vs. C3000
From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:50:40 +0800
"Richard F. Man" wrote:
> 

> Ah! Good point. The truth is probably somewhere in between? Anyway, here
> are two shots demonstrating what I mean:
> http://www.dragonsgate.net/pub/ari-and-buddha.jpg
> http://www.dragonsgate.net/pub/ari-and-buddha2.jpg
> 
> One is with the OM4T 40/2. I forgot what shutter speed, but it is low.
> 1/30-1/60 at best. The other is C3000. I think it's easy to tell which one
> is which :-) Too bad we didn't notice her hands were in opposite order!

Hi Richard,

Very nice shots, don't forget there is in-camera sharpening on the DC.
You can also do the same for the 40/2 shot (very mild sharpening added
here):

http://www.accura.com.hk/ari-and-buddha3.jpg

The 1/30s shutter may also added some softness. BTW the 40/2 without
flash look much better than the C3000 with flash turn on :-) If my
memory serve me well there is a 40/2 shot (full page) on the OM System
Lens Handbook, the photo looks very sharp and aperture was F2 or 2.8
only. Anyone has the book on hand may have a look.

C.H.Ling

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz