>
> The 50/2 wide open is noticeably softer at infinity
> mainly because at f5.6-f11 this lens is bleeding edge
> sharp whereas at f2 it just isn't as sharp (it is
> still pretty sharp wide open just that at f8 this lens
> is by far the sharpest lens I have bar none). And, at
> 1:2 and greater magnification I think f2 is sharper
> than f16, the lens performs very well in it's macro
> role across the board and even at 8x10 I can't really
> tell a difference between f-stops except f16 which
> doesn't perform so well.
As you go into this magnification range the smaller stops
begin to be degraded by diffraction. If you use the
Airy disk (in microns) = f# rule-of-thumb, at 1:2 the
f/16 becomes an effective f/22 and the Airy disk is
about 1/50mm, which kinda impairs your ability to get
the 60 or more lp/mm you want for really sharp photos.
>
> I've never used Leica so I can't comment all I can say
> is the 50/2 is my favorite and most used lens it takes
> great photos, is fast, and extremely versatile.
>
> Mark Lloyd
>
> --- Robert Gries <rgg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Gary's tests seem to indicate that the performance
> > of the 50/2 wide open
> > isn't that great However, I know that he has posted
> > results in the past
> > about how it rates next to the L*ica. Any comments
> > about results at f2?
> >
> > Bob
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
> http://health.yahoo.com
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|