RE: [OM] 28-28/4, was 35-80, was originally 85/2 subject matter

[om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

The 28-48/4 is pretty nice.  I've used it many times as a travel lens,
paired with an 85 or 100.  I just find it's not quite wide enough often, or
the range is not enough. 

Oh, I also have the hard-to-find hood. :-))

Skip


Original Message:
-----------------
From:  T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 16:27:56 +0200 (CEST)
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [OM] 35-80, was 85/2 subject matter


How's the performance of the 28-48 - e.g. compared to the Sigma one
(failing that, compared to, say, the 28/2.8 and the 50/1.8)?

The voices tell me, though, that since the 28-48 is a Zuiko, then I do
really-really need it....better listen to them....

--thomas



--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >