>My ranking from best to worst would be:
>21/3.5, 24/2.8, 28/3.5, 28/2.8
As soon as I sent my post, I realized that I forgot to mention
that you liked the 28/3.5 better than the 28/2.8. From the
comments in the archives, it seems that the 28/3.5 depended on
whether you got a good lens or a bad lens. Gary's first test
of it showed terrible results, but his subsequent test showed
it to be better than his test of the 28/2.8. Variability!
Pete
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|