From Babelfish. Sorry for the length:
****
DI division business department manager Kojima ? mediating/helping person
Listener
Yamada Hisashi beauty husband
Yamada this time, to interview cooperating, thank you for.
Promptly is, but preceding, being to like to ask the story of the digital
single-lens reflex conception which it was held with in the lecture " of
Kodak e-Revolution 2001 ", was published on April 27th, designates 4/3 inch
CCD as the base it does, but.
Don't you think? Kojima this time is, above before the especially this
speaking, it leaps, is not left over basically however it is is, don't you
think?.
Understanding, the ?, we have asked Yamada that, it is is. (Laughing)
Kojima well, so is? (Laughing)
Because it is Yamada, if the side something about one there is a your new
story, is the honest place, but.
The part which Kojima still, can be said there is a part which it cannot
question, it is is, but don't you think? * & *.
Because it is Yamada, in the range which can be said * & *.
Kojima first, forming the forum, we would like to develop, it is is.
Concerning the forum, when we would like to keep making in a some way. With
article after and before the this, the Kodak CCD (laughing). Being
presumed, however it increases.
As for Yamada it is, as for that being to be presumption.
As for Kojima that when to the last it is presumption.
Yamada in brief, " you said at that place because, only the notion that
where so probably will be ", being not to understand in this way.
- From about 2 years ago it was, " 4/3 inch conception "
Yamada in the first place, those of 4/3 inches as a conception when
probably are story what from time?
Don't you think? the Kojima 4/3 inch splash, from now the combining which
is about 2 years ago. Don't you think? us, don't you think? in the
technical Headquarters-research & Development " with the format ahead,
something is best from this?", ? ? verification the variety was done.
Therefore, data which is presented with seminar of the other day when if
anything, is old, it is is. In a word, as for the 35mm lens when you use,
when it becomes such a wind. Or, thinking from various potential, as for a
proposition that, you received from method of our technical developing, 4/3
inches are most appealing, it is is.
Another, " 2/3 it is good there is no we?", however it combines, " with is
not popular to about well 1 inch and the ? ? good kana " combines and the
variety you think it is is. Well, the variety it is size of the result and
the lens which were thought when with, when everyone it keeps thinking of
those which are said, the area of 4/3 inches is best, specially such a word
? temporary of our technology whether it is it is not, the party who is
done, proposed the proposition, don't you think? it is is. With that, "
well, so or, or so ", the ? ?, at that time, however you have heard it is is.
Yamada exactly the time the ? ?, it becomes the time " of C-2500L ", don't
you think?, when you refer to the type.
Don't you think? Kojima so is, don't you think? it is about 2500.
When Yamada in the first place, making the " C-1400L " and " C-2500L ",
after all as for those of lens exchange type, as for one time being
examined, the ? it is is?
Don't you think? Kojima so is, " C-2500L " it reaching the point where
separate it is possible, the ? ? ? you said, don't you think?, don't you
think? at one time. Therefore 2500 * & *, so so that you remove from the
around that once after all with as many as 2/3, it thought also the kana
which is possible once. However this time depending upon when, well a
little it becomes large even with " E-10 ", as for removing when it is
possible.
After all, unless it makes fix type, just that the ? ? ? bearing long, it
does, don't you think?. Therefore, just that the, flange back not taking ?
? is not good, it is with, that much after all as for the system, when by
all means it becomes large. Therefore originally, as for digital as for fix
type most being suited, the ?.
Don't you think? this it leaps, how thinks and so, it is. Making problem
whatever of the focal plain rubbish of example, it fixes after all and the
? ? uninformed, well such with the notion that where, truth, fix type is
good after all it does not occur, as and, before the this said, if it is
that class at 400 ten thousand and 500 ten thousand, generally the normal
person means not to need, it is with.
Well, Minolta we would like to see 7 times saying, because we color is the
original ? thinking, preparing, increases the lens. So when it does, if in
any case there is one series or two serial fix types, as for the feeling,
as for most consumers kana already sufficiently, being on one hand, however
the ? it is is.
As spoken even with seminar before the this, because those where the
exchange type ? ? you say after all after all are dream. Then, with lens
style something of the photographs which become familiar long, that, well
the completely same not being even in digital age, if it is attacked with
new thought, thinking in the wind, good kana, however the ? it is is, don't
you think?.
- Balance of lens efficiency came off, " 4/3 inch system "
The Yamada 4/3 inch ? ? you tried writing really, however it is is, well
enough deca- I it is is, don't you think?. Because as for those of lens
exchange type of the APS size CCD, the APS size private body is not used,
however it is ? ? ? ? reason in that size. That when causing the body
properly in CCD exclusive use of APS size, so large the air, kana which
does not stop being effective doing, the ?.
That, body side splash of Kojima.
Yamada body side.
Kojima simply after all, as for the lens the ? ? ? it is largely.
Don't you think? the Yamada lens becomes large.
The Kojima lens to leap, when amount of the APS, straight it tries to
insert the light ray after all in the CCD, because after all as for left
and right something to be extremely large the ? ? ? ? ?, wide something to
be larger the ? ? ? it is. Perhaps as for me, most as for being the limit
thinking it is wide, the ? it is is with the APS. It cannot make wide.
Perhaps with thinking, it increases honest wide.
Therefore in such sense, they are 4/3 inches, when and others it makes
honestly, when perhaps the normal 35mm compared to it does truly, because
there is a place of the extent perhaps, it becomes large. After all, taking
in that much largely, such, that it ranks small after all even with the
cousin and cannot use it is is, don't you think?. The ? ? ? you obtain
around certainly and ardently are good but it is when so it does, unless it
can guarantee light, combining.
When well color it is there being a thing, when you think of that, after
all the brightness and, straight it can stretch out, as for the CCD pixel
plenty is large remains, just a little being slanted, all right. However,
if it makes small, it causes the color mixture by all means, becomes
blurred and/or the ? ? what is said occurs by any means. Therefore in the
form of 10 mu or more, the system is made as it is now directly with the
APS. In other words, when that it is, but at the very most truth, what of
300 ten thousand pixels or less you do with that, when it is is, you can
call that it is sufficient with the current lens, don't you think?.
Don't you think? Yamada it becomes so certainly.
The Kojima place, original ? I saying, however the ? it is is, " the silver
salt you live after all and the person who divides is good ", " biting with
anything, it is not necessary the ? ? ? to put in place the territory of
the silver salt digitally and to change ". As for that, the silver salt
there is a world of the silver salt appearance and, you use simply clearly
and it is selfish when, it is personal use when, it is privacy when, it is
environmental problem when with, when you say, when after all digital one
directly becomes profitable, this is the case that it has been well clear,
don't you think?.
You can print by your, everyone it is possible with your own environment,
when human rights problem steadily keeps becoming hard from now on, when
after all it is American something, don't you think?, don't you think?, it
does not print various types, with the silver salt, the ? ? the problem
which is said occurring, because it increases.
Therefore when of such a thing is thought, digital after all keeps being
center, it keeps becoming system, you are not wrong, however it is is, the
number of pixels of the silver salt is put in place entirely digitally and
the ? ? which is changed what you say, thinks it is nonsense, it is is.
When that it leaps, is good being the territory of the scanner. Such a
photograph how almost it is not, therefore it is.
That, making the CCD of the 35mm, super refining with this, the ? ? which
it keeps making this thinking it is the world where almost it is not it
increases the fact that you say, don't you think?. Don't you think? well,
it probably is the wasteful world. Don't you think? well " however it is
possible technically, doing, it is method of thinking there is no meaning ".
On one hand, for the consumer, furthermore, thinking, it is the system
which almost can really be used to the professional however it increases,
to about the place sufficiently at 4/3 inches the kana which is not.
Conversely 4/3 inches, there is a possibility where it can increase
resolution and with. Don't you think? as for this, with matching of lens.
- As for picture quality is approached to the current APS size CCD machine
to the capability which
It is Yamada sensuous story, but in the picture quality aspect, to the
level which is approached to the single-lens reflex which the CCD of
current APS size was used in brief, go it may it probably is feeling what
sufficiently?
Kojima it can obtain, as for that is not wrong, don't you think? is, it can
go that.
Don't you think? that, after all technology becoming good, it increases,
don't you think?. Don't you think? as for me, vis-a-vis refining always
displaying doubt, " to do too much the ? ? it is not good, to do too much
the ? ? it is not good ", the ? ? you say, but it is don't you think? after
all well enough, as for the semiconductor manufacturer persevering, the ?.
As for SONY something, persevering extremely, the ?.
The extent which cannot be thought technically, unexpected and everyone
persevering, the ?. With with the notion that where you say, such
technology becoming large, if the ? ? which can be utilized you think of
that you say, you say whether the dynamic range can come off properly at
well 4/3 inches, it probably can also take and. That increases larger one
being decided, the CCD itself profitably, don't you think?. Simply,
speaking truly from matching of the lens, you do not understand whether the
? ? ? on don't you think?, with the latest throwing.
Yamada so is, don't you think?. Therefore the honest place, looking at the
current picture of the E-10, you think the person whom you say even
sufficiently in E-10 class, is the majority it is is.
You think Kojima well, me so is. The normal person does not desire the
above that, is, truly.
Yamada that met in brief, when is with, the E-10 is 4 times that of 2/3
inches. So, " there are 4 times however, the kana ? ? which is truly
necessary for the normal person there is a doubt which is said, conversely
to there, " don't you think? it is is.
Don't you think? Kojima so is. Well, simply, in a word the ? ? which is
allowed you say to size of the system of the 35mm, if it is, as a
possibility when there is to here, conversely. Everyone uses and is
accustomed the seed. The digital ? ? as for the fact that you say, when it
is accustomed smaller. Well, perhaps it can make even the E-10, smaller, it
is is, don't you think?, the CCD is accustomed well, the spring. Because it
means to be good making the lens darker.
Well, Minolta something, making the lens dark, when it makes 7 times,
combining. Magnification ratio is simple, don't you think?, whether the ? ?
? when you say. Well, because our current person just a little, at the size
which almost does not change to 10 times it is possible. Therefore as for
there, as for magnification ratio excessively there is no relationship,
however it is is, lens speed is effective, don't you think?.
- As for shutter unit?
Yamada so is, don't you think?. So, it keeps entering to the a little
concrete place, it is is, when with the notion that where, focal plain
shutter what is used, but in the story before, lens exchange is done in
brief, when problem of the rubbish occurs. But what this time probably will
complete that the solution, the wind that it received with the nuance, is,
however it is is.
Because Kojima well, after all it is the consumer, with utmost effort the
blower - with even letting do, you are serious by your, die. Concerning
that, how doing, what it solves and applying says, solution appearing
completely, is not ? meaning.
After all simply, as for the rubbish, when it is problem. If if possible,
there does not solve the problem of the rubbish, the single-lens reflex ? ?
for the consumer saying, very there are any difficult forcing things, don't
you think? with as for the place where you say, it is made fact.
As for Yamada, however you cannot say, as for the part of that not worrying
excessively, it becomes some shape, it seems the good way, the system is
completed.
If with the notion that where, here by any means difficulty, we would like
to think of that Kojima well, if possible it solves such, that in
prerequisite, it means don't you think? becoming the inconvenient system,
don't you think?.
For example however is, there is a mount surface even with Yamada, don't
you think?, rear side, for example very that without using the mirror from
the mount surface, when with the all prism, it is the optical finder,
however is, entirely like this the line ? ? ? it is uninformed with the
prism. So, when it does, it is the meaning which is and can close airtight
don't you think?.
Kojima so is, it can close airtight, however it is is, whether or not the
focal plainness is used, is. Because it is the focal plain itself rubbish,
on the other hand as for being problem. So, the focal plain rubbish is
attached, putting wherever, it is is.
Therefore, when the through-the-lens shutter ? ? which after all does not
use the focal plainness the ? cod which is to say, with it is the
through-the-lens shutter this time, everyone burden puts on the all system,
don't you think?. Furthermore when it reaches 4/3 inches, speed it cannot
put out, is. Therefore don't you think? don't you think? the place over
there, if from difficulty of durability and the system, simply being
progressive, it stipulates all, don't you think?, because the shutter is
simple, as for such method, there are times when it is one more possible.
With Yamada, for example is, but very that in case of Olympus, the rotary
shutter we would like to see it is the meaning which is technology, don't
you think?, is that how?
Because Kojima well even the rotary shutter, that is the metal, don't you
think? well enough after all, as for some there is a problem. Simply, the
current focal plainness would like to see, is not the meaning to rub, it is
with, even then it turns it is with, " No " you cannot say completely,
don't you think?. It does not come out with you cannot call the rubbish.
Then, the rotary ? ? you say the splash, after all it becomes large, it is
is, so, saying. Simply, because they are 4/3 inches, half size and with
half something, unless it is the story which cannot be thought well. Don't
you think? (laughing) with, you adopt never speaking, increase it is the
empty, please do not misunderstand at this point in time.
( It continues to the second section )
(June 28th of 2001 release)
At 08:47 PM 7/22/2002 -0400, you wrote:
http://www.digitalcamera.gr.jp/report/4-3SLR/43SLR-1.htm
// richard http://www.imagecraft.com
[ For technical support, please include all previous replies in your msgs. ]
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|