I found a key in one of the Color Foto pages that answered by
question. Dotted lines are tangential and solid are sagittal.
Interesting that the 200/5 comes off better than the 200/4 in this
kind of test when it is usually used because of its light weight and
small size in spite of not being considered quite as good as the
200/4. The choice of wide open and 2 stops in seems to penalize fast
lenses. The 21/2 which most tests and experience indicates is
superior to the 21/3.5 comes off worse. And then it is compared to a
slow Leica and a slow Zeiss superwide and also does not do that well.
One would guess that the 21/3.5 would come out about the same as the
Leica and Zeiss.
--
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California
?
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|