Subject: | RE: [OM] urban legends #2435 & #3528 |
---|---|
From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 19 Jul 2002 11:42:01 -0700 |
Are you sure about that? That would be true with a hand held meter
perhaps. But since the manual meter of the camera measures light
coming through the lens it should not matter whether the lens is
shifted or not to get an accurate setting.
Winsor Not true. When manually metering, the exposure will be off if the lens is shifted, however an AUTO/OTF exposure will be correct. Refer to the shift lens manuals. <snip> Someone recently remarked that you won't get an accurate exposure reading when a shift lens is off-center. Hel-lo? Unless the lens has severe edge fall-off (which shift lenses are designed _not_ to have), there is no difference in metering with the lens centered or moved all the way over. What matters is _what_ you meter, not the part of the field it's in. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OT trivia question about digital, Tom Trottier |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [OM] urban legends #2435 & #3528, Robert Gries |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] urban legends #2435 & #3528, Robert Gries |
Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] urban legends #2435 & #3528, Robert Gries |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |