Winsor,
I dunno either, but I would guess that it mounts on a piece of Olympus
medical gear.
Oh, oh, does that mean we need to shop the evil place for used
endoscopes, to have a "complete" OM collection. <g>
Bill Stanke
Tom Scales wrote:
>
> Looks like a regular 35/2.8 reverse mounted on a weird mount. Since the lens
> isn't worth more than $50, that's one expensive mount.
>
> Tom
>
> Can someone tell me what this is?
>
> http://www.keh.com/shop/SHOWPRODUCT.CFM?CRID=3484718&SKID=OM0699905234404&SI
> D=newused&BID=OM&CID=06&SOID=N&ISPRICE=299.0
> --
> Winsor Crosby
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|