Really, seems the lens tests show some difference. Are you saying this
difference is irrelevant to the final photo product?
Bryan Pilati
OM-2n; IS-3
Va-USA
Disclaimer: I'm always joking
unless I should be serious.
----- Original Message -----
From: <ll.clark@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] 100/2.8 BIN
> In <00f101c21fe0$69303ea0$c1140044@xxxxxxxxxx>, on 06/29/02 at 10:47 PM,
> "Bryan Pilati" <bryan223@xxxxxxx> said:
>
> >Great price, but still a SC lens.
>
> Ah, but glory be to all that's holy, there's to be little difference to
> be seen between the SC and MC versions of this fine optik.
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> les clark / edgewater, nj / usa
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|