Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Review of 200mm f4 Zuiko

Subject: Re: [OM] Review of 200mm f4 Zuiko
From: "Jim L'Hommedieu" <lamadoo@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 07:06:37 -0400
Told ya.  Nah-nah-naaaaah.... nah.  5 elements doesn't cut it.  I guess even
Yoshihisa Maitani is entitled to a mistake or two, eh?

Lama

Even the rangefinder 35RD has six.  The 35SP had seven elements!  Now that
must be some stealthy concert camera!


Subject: [OM] Review of 200mm f4 Zuiko


> (Extracted from the February 1991 issue of the UK photo magazine
"Practical
> Photography"; this was a group test of 6 Zuiko lenses.)

> This particular OM tele isn't a high flier in optical terms, alas.
Central
> definition, though consistent, peaks at a relatively modest figure by f11.
> Other apertures are capable of giving perfectly decent images, but the
> centre doesn't soar like other Zuikos.



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz