Hahahah, I recently bought a Zuiko 200 f/4 and was planning on selling my
Kiron 70-210mm f/4. Are we on opposing paths?
Bryan Pilati
OM-2N; IS-3
Va-USA
Disclaimer: I'm always joking
unless I should be serious.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wayne Culberson" <waynecul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Zuiko 200/4 and 50mm MTF
>
>
> > >Now that I've SOLD my mint Zuiko 200/4 with the
> > >correct, mint hard case,
> > >I can tell my tale. I snapped up a Kiron 80-200 /f4
> > >on e*ay for......
> >
> (Ag wrote)
> > Sick man. The Kiron is PROBABLY ok, but the purist in me...
> >
>
> I bought a Kiron 80-200/4.5 recently from G. Reese, who had praise for it.
> I'm still testing it, and have a couple rolls of film now waiting to go to
> the lab, which have some shots on them using this lens.
> I was shooting with it yesteday, and noticed it reads about 1 to 2 stops
> slower than the Zuiko 135/2.8, when both set 135mm at f/16 and pointed to
> the same scene (using OM2s in auto mode).
> Do all zooms do this, or just the ones I own?
> Wayne
>
> ps. Thanks to those who gave help on the rewind handle pin problem.
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|