Actually the cameras I mentioned has some kind of control on the aperture
closing lever. The motion is slower than other OMs, hence the force and
vibration is lower. On the other hand I think OM1,2,3,4 all has similar
vibration as the design is similar except the OM3,4 has a sub-mirror but I
don't think it will create big different in vibration.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Wilcox" <jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] OM shutters
> If it is a matter of voting, I would agree with C.H. (dunno about the
OM707
> though). I think maybe the OM-4(x) is equally good. I've made many good,
> sharp exposures in the critical range from 1/2 to 1/30 second with long
> lenses using a cable release with OM-2S and OM-4 both.
>
> Joel W.
>
> At 07:40 PM 5/25/2002 +0800, you wrote:
> >For least vibration, I vote, OM2sp, OM40 and OM707.
> >
> >C.H.Ling
> >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|