Hi Moose
Re: your Tokina 35-200; is it the ATX f3.5-4.5, or the SD f4-5.6 ? What is
your opinion of it?
Roger Key
dreammoose
<dreammoose@attbi. To:
olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
com> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: [OM] Re: ( OM )
lens - AT-X 80-200 mm F-2.8 and Tamron 350mm mirror
owner-olympus@Zuik
o.sls.bc.ca
16-05-02 10:43
Please respond to
olympus
Was that 160GBP snipe you? I'd be sorry, but you already have one! I was
out and it was an automatic snipe through auctionstealer.
People pay that kind of money for a Tamron 350mm/5.6 mirror lens? I
think I thought I would be use minet more often that I actually do. It
isn't very flexible, so it doesn't end up in the bag, so it doesn't get
used.
I agree the Tokina will be a much more useful lens. I have the Tamron SP
equivalent and it's a great lens. I decided to try the Tokina for the
lower weight, smaller size and less intrusive, permanent tripod mount.
Gary's tests give the edge to the Tamron, but I'm not sure I will see
the difference in practical shooting and a lighter, smaller lens is a
lens I'm likely to use more often.
I think the price is OK, but not a great deal. After using his (clearly
stated) exchange rate and paying for airmail and insurance, it's more
like USD280. On the other hand, if I really like the lens, it will be
well worth it. I certainly prefer the Tokina 35-200 to the Tamron
35-210, handling is similar, but the Tokina is smaller and half a pound
lighter!
Moose
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|