One question- If the tax is not collected from the purchaser (as in when the
goods enter his/her country) but is supposed to be collected by the company
that sells the goods, and then sent by them to the buyer's country, how in
heck can a foreign country force a foreign company to do it? There being no
law or requirement in the seller's home country to require them to collect
and send on this tax, how would it be enforced if companies refuse? What am I
missing here?
Thanks
George S.
EU Plans to Tax Internet Downloads
By JIM KRANE
.c The Associated Press
(May 7) - The European Union agreed Tuesday to impose a new tax on products
downloaded from the Internet - including software, videos and music - aiming
to help Europe's Web-based businesses compete with U.S. companies.
EU Taxation Commissioner Frits Bolkestein said the new tax rules ``will
remove the serious competitive handicap which EU firms currently face.''
Bolkestein complained that U.S. giants of the industry levy no taxes from
online customers. The effect has been to give a sales tax loophole to
European buyers, who find cheaper-priced goods on U.S.-based sites.
Although U.S. businesses are the focus of the legislation, the tax affects
all non-European Internet businesses selling digital products, whether in the
United States or elsewhere, said Nicholas Colannino, a European Commission
spokesman in New York.
A separate measure that taxes ``hard'' shipped goods, such as books, could be
considered in the future, Colannino said.
The U.S. has complained the EU taxes pre-empt ongoing talks on Internet
taxation at the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. U.S.
trade authorities have said they may lodge a complaint against the new tax at
the World Trade Organization.
Rep. Mark Foley, R-Fla., who chairs a congressional task force on the
entertainment industry, said he hoped the EU doesn't expand the tax to cover
all goods sold online.
``They have single-handedly reversed a fiscally sound philosophy of keeping
the Internet tax-free,'' Foley said. ``The only ones who will suffer are
their own people.''
The European Commission said, however, that the tax ``complements the
international process at the OECD.''
The tax, to be enforced beginning July 1, 2003, would take effect when an
Internet customer in, say, Belgium, purchases MP3 music files from, say, San
Diego, Calif.-based EMusic.com.
EMusic.com would have to determine electronically that the purchaser is
located in Belgium. Using that information, EMusic's computers would add the
appropriate Belgian sales tax to the purchase.
This formula marks a significant change from the current tax rules, which
permit EU residents to buy the same MP3 from EMusic.com without paying tax.
But if a European customer buys the MP3 from, say, Stockholm-based
eClassical.com, an online vendor of classical music, tax is levied on the
sale.
Under the system, as now, European consumers will pay only their own
country's so-called value-added tax. U.S. companies will be forced to charge
customers the prevailing rate in force where their customers live.
Each of the EU's 15 countries taxes different products at different rates.
General value-added rates vary from 15 percent in Luxembourg to 25 percent in
Sweden.
The U.S. Treasury Department fears U.S. firms will be required to charge the
EU's value-added tax at higher rates than their EU competitors. The
department - and American vendors - also worry that EU rules will breed a
complicated, difficult-to-enforce tax system that hampers e-commerce in
general.
``We continue to be concerned about the potential for discrimination inherent
in the new EU VAT regime that applies to downloaded products,'' said Treasury
Department spokeswoman Tara Bradshaw.
Before Tuesday's decision, EU authorities considered handing U.S. companies
the same advantages as European competitors, by allowing them to charge a
single EU-wide VAT rate.
But member states blocked that idea. They feared companies would all set up
for business in low-tax Luxembourg.
The tax has nothing to do with the ongoing U.S.-EU trade spat over American
tariffs on foreign steel, Colannino said.
``There's no link at all,'' he said. ``This has been in the works for a
while.''
05/07/02 19:03 EDT
|